Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petra Pajalič

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Editors expressed concerns about the lack of online sources, but there was a rough consensus that the subject's appearance in the Women's Tennis Association tour met the relevant notability guideline. No delete !votes after being relisted and open for a few weeks. (non-admin closure) Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Petra Pajalič (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough sources to satisfy notability. Lidsdonne (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lidsdonne (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - might scrape through WP:NTENNIS with the one ITF win. I was thinking of nominating Ekaterina Dranets for similar reasons but I think that any player that has played on the WTA Tour, even if only once, is inherently notable. Not 100% sure, though, and it's hard to find previous similar tennis AfDs as we don't have a sorting category for them. Spiderone 13:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.