Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Carn (2003 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 19:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Pop Carn (2003 film)

Pop Carn (2003 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is lacking. There are sources, but I do not believe them to be reliable. Mr. Guye (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• Keep I am not an expert on Indian movies, but it appears that this film was created by notable actors and filmmakers. Perhaps someone with more expertise in the subject can improve the referencing? And Adoil Descended (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Alts

Tamil:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alt spelling:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: "Pop Carn" "Popcarn"

• Keep Expanded searches find this topic spoken of in multiple reliable sources. WP:NF is met. IE: Sify, The Hindu, Sify and more. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• Nominator? Your opinion on the improved article? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@MichaelQSchmidt:The sourcing is still mediocre but I am satisfied with the WP:NFILMS argument and the WP:INDAFD argument. I'd withdraw, but it is very close to 7 days, so this AfD might as well go in the books as a "keep". --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes Mr. Guye, sadly, Google does not crawl nor index Indian newspaper articles properly, thus causing issues when using it to search for sources on Indian films. I've found the tools at WP:INDAFD are quite helpful in any WP:BEFORE. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

• Time to close as keep, not to relist. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.