Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 May 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 3
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MuppiesLogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo of MUPPIES (Muslim Urban Professionals). Listed as "Own work." ALH (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- EXIF missing, file looks like resized and hence pixelated, there some black border at bottom. I doubt the uploader is owner. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the quality of the photo is so poor it's hardly worth keeping. Eeekster (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Brixtonrailmap.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a derivative work of the tube map, which is copyright protected, and so this work cannot qualify for a CC licence. I would suggest that it be replaced by a fair use rationale. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a derivative work of the tube map, which is copyright protected, and so this work cannot qualify for a CC licence. I would suggest that it be replaced by a fair use rationale. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Emran hashmi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Watermarked image with no real source. Eeekster (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Captured from a TV broadcast? Eeekster (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The copyright holder released the photo under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) and the match in which it was token was in a dark match. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like the "copyright holder" isn't really the owner of the copyright. This is probably a video capture and that doesn't transfer rights. Eeekster (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The flickr user is not the copyright holder. The flickr account SexyOVW on flickr is a collector of various stolen photos, this is obvious by various watermarks on the photos. --Martin H. (talk) 11:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like the "copyright holder" isn't really the owner of the copyright. This is probably a video capture and that doesn't transfer rights. Eeekster (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The copyright holder released the photo under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) and the match in which it was token was in a dark match. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Whilst the author claims to have personally taken the photograph, it is a widely used image[1], published most notably on the government of Pakistan website. I think the validity of the license can be questioned and it seems unlikely to be free. Hazhk Talk to me 21:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.